[Game] Real Football 2012 / Real Soccer 2012

Note: There is already a Real Football 2013 / Real Soccer 2013 in Google Play. But since the concept of the 2012 version is almost totally different that of 2013 version, and both version are, at press time, still available for download, this post is dedicated to the 2012 version. Review of 2013 version will be up soon.

For some reason best known to Gameloft, they have two seemingly identical free apps on Google Play - Real Football 2012 and Real Soccer 2012. Perhaps Gameloft is afraid that those American do not know what is football and the rest of the world cannot recognise soccer.

Anyway, I am moving on the assumption that both are the same. But for the record, I have, for unknown reasons, downloaded and installed Real Soccer 2012.

Concept

For most football gamers, this game is fairly simple. You join a tournament (cup or league) and win it. In keeping with other apps in Google Play however, you have to play in a certain starter tournament to unlock other leagues and cups.

Getting Started

When you enter the game, you will be greeted by David Villa's face.

In a funny way, you start with the biggest football tournament - World Cup. Upon kicking asses in World Cup, you will unlock English League, so on and so forth.

You whole life would be revolving around winning more and more tournaments.

Control

Control in this game can be seen from the following picture:

You get an eight-point directional control, and separate buttons for pass and shoot when attacking. When defending, the pass and shoot will turned in "press" and "tackle".

There are also a few default special moves like step-over etc that you can pull.

The control will take some time to get used to, but is generally acceptable. There are however two major problems with the control:

1) Lag time

During defense, you have to wait for some time before you can use a selected player. By then, your player may not have been at the place you wanted him to be. It pissed me off quite a few times.

2) No header?

Until now, i still can't find the button to head a ball. Everytime i crossed, my player chest the ball down then kicked it goal-wards. Nevermind that i hit "shoot" before the ball even reaches his head.

The funny thing is, your opponent can use header. 

Stamina Points

Like any free apps, quite apart from irritating ads (which is acceptable), there are some built-in money grubbing mechanism.

RF2012's one and only trick is something called stamina. You need stamina to play. Each match costs you 50 stamina points, each stamina point costs you 10 minutes wait, and stamina points will be fully filled up at 100 points.

In short, if you refused to pay, you can play around 2 matches a day.

You may be wondering why the hell Gameloft didn't just allow you to buy the game outright. The answer, i think, lies here - consider its closest competititor, FIFA12. You may make a one-off purchase for FIFA 2012 which costs you $5.18. RF2012, however, will seduce you with its free game status and then seduce you to continuously pay them as long as you need the in-game stamina point.

No, that is not Messi!

One of the reason why you would spend some money and time to download a huge game (or pay for one) is to play your favorite team.

Naturally, that includes having the real-life players of your team in there.

RF2012 however was unable to provide this experience fully.

Unless the team name is the name of a place, they can offer your the name, so Arsenal became London, Manchester United became Manchester Red and Liverpool became Merseysides.

So far as players' names are concerned, they got all the correct names in English Premier League but messed up players' names in other league. I certainly have no idea why. Was it because there is no intellectual property rights for personal name in UK? Beats me.

So your Messi would be, surprise, Sairme!!
  

Strangely however, when you go into practice mode and use Argentina to practice, you get your Messi.

Final Verdict

Despite the above, i genuinely enjoyed the game. It is not perfect but hey, when do we ever get a perfect game?

If you are not preparing to play this game for a few hours in a trot, you should really consider installing this game. For a free game, this game is awesome.

[Service] Opera Web Pass launched in Malaysia, DIGI first provider

Digi Malaysia has been in partnership with Opera for a while now and it came as no surprise that when Opera launches its Web Pass, Digi Malaysia would become its first partner.

Opera Web Pass works in this way - you open Opera Mini, pick a deal, and now you can surf.

If the idea is too vague for you, fret not. Let's take Digi Malaysia's Web Pass as an example.

First, open Opera Mini (Opera Mobile doesn't seem to support Web Pass).

You will be greeted with this page (normally).

Click on Digi Internet 50 cents. You will be greeted with this:

Choose you plan and enjoy your internet!


Currently, in Malaysia at least, only Digi subscribers can use this service.

A word of caution - the plan will only work if you surf using Opera Mini. And it is not applicable for video/music streaming and file download. 

Make sure you read the T&C so that you are not surprised by your bill. 

I myself have not actually bought any of the plan so I can't vouch for anything. However, when I do, I will post my experience here.

If you have tried this service, share with me your experience by thrashing the comment box!!

To download Opera Mini, click here.

To view Opera's press release, click here.

HTC, Apple enters into settlement

We might be looking at the beginning of an end to Apple's courtroom intellectual properties war against some major Android makers.

It was recently announced that Apple and HTC have reached "a global settlement that includes the dismissal of all current lawsuits and a ten-year licensing agreement".

The terms of the licensing agreement have not been made known (yet).

This bodes well for HTC who should be focusing on getting its feet back on the ground and not on courtroom battle.

But what all techies and consumers would want to see is an end to courtroom battles and back to showroom battle where everyone benefits from endless innovation and combining the best of all worlds.

Could this be the end of an era and the beginning of another?

Apple ordered by UK court to pay Samsung's legal fees

In making its disapproval of Apple's conduct clear, the UK court ordered Apple to pay all Samsung's legal fees. The UK court held that:

"As to the costs (lawyers' fees) to be awarded against Apple, we concluded that they should be on an indemnity basis. Such a basis (which is higher than the normal, "standard" basis) can be awarded as a mark of the court's disapproval of a party's conduct, particularly in relation to its respect for an order of the court. Apple's conduct warranted such an order."

 The UK court based its decision on two main points.

1) Non-compliance with the court's order in relation to publicity in magazines and newspapers

The UK court ordered Apple to post a "Samsung did not copy" notice on some specified newspapers, magazine and its own website. The order required the notice to be published on newspaper and magazines "at the earliest available issue".

This order was made on 18.10.2012 but the notice was only published on newspaper on 16.11.2012.

This, the court held, "was self-evident non-compliance with the newspaper/magazine aspect of the publicity order".

2) Website

This part is so well publicized that it is easy to guess why the judges in UK were not impressed. Mr justice Sir Robin Jacob make it so clear and simple that I can do no better than to quote his judgement:

   "22.  Here what Apple added was false and misleading. I turn to analyse it. The first sentence reads:

However, in a case tried in Germany regarding the same patent, the court found that Samsung engaged in unfair competition by copying the iPad design.

That is false in the following ways:

(a) "Regarding the same patent." No patent of any kind has been involved in Germany or here, still less "the same patent."

(b) As regards the Community Registered Design, the German Courts held that neither the Galaxy 10.1 nor the 8.9 infringed it. As to the 7.7 there was for a short while a German provisional order holding that it infringed. Whether there was a jurisdiction to make that order is very doubtful for the reasons given in my earlier judgment but in any event the order had been (or should have been) discharged by the time the Contested Notice was published.

(c) There is a finding and injunction, limited to Germany alone, that the 10.1 and 8.9 infringe German unfair competition law. But the statement is likely to be read as of more general application.


1. The second sentence reads:



A U.S. jury also found Samsung guilty of infringing on Apple's design and utility patents, awarding over one billion U.S. dollars in damages to Apple Inc.

That is misleading by omission. For the US jury specifically rejected Apple's claim that the US design patent corresponding to the Community Design in issue here was infringed. The average reader would think that the UK decision was at odds with that in the US. Far from that being so, it was in accordance with it.


2. The third sentence reads:



So while the U.K. court did not find Samsung guilty of infringement, other courts have recognized that in the course of creating its Galaxy tablet, Samsung wilfully copied Apple's far more popular iPad.

This is calculated to produce huge confusion. The false innuendo is that the UK court came to a different conclusion about copying, which is not true for the UK court did not form any view about copying. There is a further false innuendo that the UK court's decision is at odds with decisions in other countries whereas that is simply not true.


3. The reality is that wherever Apple has sued on this registered design or its counterpart, it has ultimately failed. It may or may not have other intellectual property rights which are infringed. Indeed the same may be true the other way round for in some countries Samsung are suing Apple. But none of that has got anything to do with the registered design asserted by Apple in Europe. Apple's additions to the ordered notice clearly muddied the water and the message obviously intended to be conveyed by it."

The full judgement can be found here.

What do you think? 

[Game] Angry Birds Star Wars

After hearing the news about Disney taking over Star Wars and planning for Episode 7, 8 and 9, does it not trigger some fond memories lie sleeping deep inside you?

Do you need something to ease your itch for the galaxy far far away?

Look no further, for Rovio has finally released the long awaited Angry Birds Star Wars!

Brace yourself, Angry Birds will present you Star Wars in a way never seen before, with sheer and ultimate cuteness!!!!!

If you are familiar with Angry Birds, which you no doubt will be unless you were from the galaxy far far away, the latest incarnation of Angry Birds and Star Wars should be no stranger to you.

Noting that when thing is not broken, don't bother fixing it, Rovio applied the same gameplay engine that served them so well previously - you slingshot birds to kill pigs.

But that is not all. Angry Birds have now adopted the handsomeness and prettiness in the like of I'll-be-one-Can-not-be (Obi wan Kenobi), Princess Leia, Skywalkers etc. Now not only are they cute, they are also cool.


Angry Birds Stars Wars, as the name suggest, was set in the Star Wars universe. Your first mission would aptly be on Tatooine (for the uninitiated, this is where Jedi Knight Qui-gon Jinn found the chosen one, Anakin Skywalker, in the Star Wars universe).

Nothing is wasted. Even the score sheet is in Star Wars theme.

Rovio did a great job in combining their experience in Angry-birding on land and in space with this latest incarnation. Your mission now includes slinging birds on land and in space.

It would be a great waste if Rovio did not adopt some of the most memorable Star Wars characters and features in this game. Look at the two pictures below. Which character can you see and what skills it is using?

I am not going to spoil the joy for you. Install this app and see for yourself how Angry Birds reshape the world of Star Wars! Or Star Wars reshaping the world of Angry Birds!

My fellow Jedis, may the force be with you!

Apple posted another "Samsung did not Copy" statement

After being ordered by the UK court to replace its initial statement, Apple has posted another statement to acknowledge that the UK found that Sammy's Galaxy Tab did not copy its iPad.

No hanky panky, just two paragraphs stating that the Galaxy Tab did not copy iPad and that the ruling has effect throughout the European Union.

And to Apple's credit, it did acknowledge that the previous statement is inaccurate. The link to the statement is also more prominently displayed compared to its first statement on Apple UK's website:

So prominent the link you no longer need a little red circle to find it. 

   

Apple ordered to replace "Samsung did not Copy" notice

UPDATE:  Apple has posted another notice to comply with the court's order.

You would recall the "innovative" notice that Apple came out with when ordered by the UK court to post a notice stating that Samsung's Galaxy Tab did not copy its iPad.

Samsung was not amused. Neither did the judges in the UK court. And they made that clear by ordering Apple to remove the "inaccurate" notice and replace it with a new one, reported BBC.

Apple has 48 hours to come out with an accurate notice.

As at the time of this post being written, the "inaccurate" notice has been taken down. No new notice posted yet.

Let's see what Apple will come out with next.